Mazda CX-80 VS Skoda Kodiaq

In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and functionality. While the CX-80 highlights Mazda's commitment to driving pleasure, the Kodiaq shines as a dependable all-rounder tailored to meet everyday needs.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

An In-Depth Comparison: Mazda CX-80 vs. Skoda Kodiaq

The automotive landscape is continuously evolving, with manufacturers pushing the boundaries of technology, performance, and innovation. In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, two contenders are making waves: the Mazda CX-80 and the Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles cater to families and adventure seekers alike, offering ample space, advanced features, and a range of powertrains. However, which one takes the lead in this head-to-head comparison? Let’s dive into the details.

Design and Dimensions

With a length of 4995 mm, the Mazda CX-80 is larger than the Skoda Kodiaq, which measures 4758 mm. The width of the CX-80 at 1890 mm slightly surpasses the Kodiaq's 1864 mm, while the height is comparable, with the CX-80 at 1714 mm and the Kodiaq between 1679-1683 mm. This additional size in the CX-80 translates to a more spacious cabin and potentially better cargo capacity. The CX-80 also boasts a modern, sleek design consistent with Mazda's KODO philosophy, while the Kodiaq presents a more practical, angular aesthetic typical of Skoda’s design language.

Powertrains and Performance

Both SUVs offer a variety of engine options that appeal to different types of drivers. The Mazda CX-80 features two engines: a powerful 327 HP Plug-in Hybrid and a 254 HP Diesel MHEV. For those focused on sustainability, the electric range of up to 60 km is a notable advantage. The CX-80 excels in acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in just 6.8 seconds for the hybrid variant, while its maximum speed can reach 195 km/h.

On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq's lineup includes a 204 HP Plugin Hybrid, a 193 HP Petrol MHEV, and various petrol and diesel options totaling four engines. The Kodiaq offers impressive flexibility with different power outputs, achieving 0-100 km/h in a respectable 7.8 seconds. However, in terms of performance metrics, the CX-80 takes the edge with higher maximum power and quicker acceleration.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

The Mazda CX-80 demonstrates exceptional fuel efficiency, particularly with its plug-in hybrid, consuming just 1.6 L/100km. The diesel variant, while less efficient than its hybrid counterpart, still performs well at 5.7 L/100km. In contrast, the Kodiaq’s fuel consumption varies significantly depending on the engine choice, with the most economical diesel model consuming around 5.3 L/100km. Both vehicles receive a 'B' efficiency class rating, but the CX-80's hybrid evidently stands out as a more eco-friendly option with lower CO2 emissions, registering at 35 g/km compared to Kodiaq's higher emissions range.

Interior Space and Features

Inside, both SUVs prioritize comfort and versatility. The Mazda CX-80 offers seating for up to seven passengers, making it a great choice for larger families or those needing extra space. However, the Skoda Kodiaq provides exceptional trunk capacity, boasting between 745 to 910 liters, compared to the CX-80's 258 liters. This is a considerable advantage for those who need a generous amount of cargo space for long road trips.

In terms of technology, both models are equipped with the latest infotainment systems. While Mazda's interface is often praised for its user-friendly layout, Skoda offers innovative features like a virtual cockpit, which enhances the driver's experience. Both vehicles also come with a full suite of safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems.

Conclusion: Which One Reigns Supreme?

While both the Mazda CX-80 and Skoda Kodiaq cater to similar markets, their strengths vary significantly. The CX-80 excels in performance and efficiency, making it the choice for those prioritizing driving dynamics and sustainability. On the other hand, the Kodiaq shines with its vast interior space and practicality, appealing particularly to families who need room for both passengers and cargo.

Ultimately, the decision will hinge on individual preferences: whether one leans towards performance and innovation or practicality and spaciousness, both vehicles present fantastic options in the competitive SUV market.